Aesthetic Experience & Ethical Reflection

Photo by Lieselotte De Bie on Unsplash

And from the solicitude of the sublime act we are led directly to its communicability by a pre-reflective and immediate grasp of its relation of agreement with the situation: in this given case, here and now, we are certain that this is exactly what had to be done, in the same way that we consider a given painting to be a masterpiece because right away we have the feeling that it realizes the perfect adequation of the singularity of the solution to the singularity of the question.[1]

I

A Singular Experience

There is a shared singular experience with the artist and the spectator, the writer and the reader, and the composer and the listener, when the listener suddenly hears music in the silence between the notes, when the reader unknowingly begins reading the text between the lines, and when the spectator falls silent and is drawn deep into a painting. The artist, the writer, and the composer on one hand; the spectator, the reader, and the listener on the other—at one point they all experienced a shared singular moment with the configured work: they were drawn into it, began gazing into space, and began seeing images coming together in their minds. And they knew exactly what to do next.

A unique, singular moment has been captured through an artistic genius, encapsulated in a work of art and is left on its own, no tricks, no hard-selling. Then somebody comes by and picks it up from there. Suddenly, it explodes—bursts of colors and images of a singular moment come flooding out into his imagination, losing him in thoughts, drowning him. Just then, it becomes too large to be left unnoticed, and too deep to be left forgotten. Then it begins to talk, communicating, passing on that “unique gesture to be done.”

In one singular moment, those at the either side of the configuration share a unique experience with it. It doesn’t matter if it is only an adequation, but they both know, and in that same moment meditate on a singular question, and agree, though without yet a language for it, on a singular solution.

II

An Implied Intention

             No one knows exactly what the intention of the artist is, usually not even the artist himself. In the same way, no one also knows what exactly is the intention of the spectator before walking in to a gallery, or when just passing by a painting, and exactly what happens when his gaze falls upon it for the first time and almost immediately recognizes it as a masterpiece.

In “Aesthetic Experience,” Ricoeur talks about the great difficulty of reflections on art:

For the aesthetic experience involves each time a spectator, a listener, a reader who is also in a relation of singularity with the singularity of the work; but at the same time, it is the first act of communication of the work to others and, virtually to all. The work is like a trail of fire issuing from itself, reaching me and reaching beyond me to the universality of humanity.[2]

There really is a great difficulty because art in this sense broadly includes all art. From the classic and high-class art to graffiti and protest materials, even perhaps to furniture pieces, mass produced articles, the little stamps, or even trinkets: one could never know, nor perhaps imagine, which of these would turn out to have more people being drawn to. Of course there are pieces which have been intended explicitly for a specific purpose, such as the books in a bookstore’s inspirational shelf which one could just grab for inspiration, rave music and laser lights set up in bars so the party could sweat out a dance in an electric beat, or a protesters’ ugly effigy which is obviously going to be burned to actualize its end. However, we cannot also say that one is just confused when he gets inspiration from the mystery fiction shelf, feels stillness in rock music, or experiences tranquilizing peace while running his fingers on some carvings on an armchair, not finding it crude or artless, but just beautiful.

When the work finds itself being looked into and not just being seen; listened to, not just being heard over; and read closely, not just being leafed through—that singular moment becomes a complete aesthetic experience. It is when the Ricoeurian three panels overlap, as though a Venn diagram: it becomes the meeting point of the artist, the artwork, and the spectator. Perhaps, despite each of them existing in different time, space or dimension, they meet in a unique, single instance. With the drawing of the three elements, a spark ignites, a trail of fire is set forth, reaching, sharing the experience to the universality of humanity.[3] The previously unseen and unheard of artistic expression interpreted roughly in a mere adequation gets communicated, gets understood, and gets grasped immediately, and also, with surprisingly perfect eloquence, immediately becomes the perfect solution to the one great problem at hand.

III

The Ethical Aim

            Thus far, we have not yet fathomed deep into the elements’ individual intentions before the convergence took place. At either side of the completed, but still non-thinking, art piece, we have the artist and the spectator. Both, at different times, with the same pace, taking two, three steps back: one finally seeing it completed and is satisfied, while the other seeing it for the first time and is fascinated; both immediately recognizing it as a masterpiece, both straight away declaring that this is just the way it is to be done.

Whatever their previous intentions were, they now have become unnecessary, or, at the least, secondary. Now, they turn around, armed with a purpose, with a single ethical aim, to do good, i.e., with and for others in just institutions.[4]

  

 

 

 

Ivan Richard F. Deligero

January 26, 2013


[1] Paul Ricoeur, “Aesthetic Experience,” in Critique and Conviction: Conversations with François Azouvi and Marc de Launay, trans. Kathleen Blamey (1998), Cambridge: Polity Press, 182.

[2] Ibid., 180.

[3] See quotation above.

[4] See further Paul Ricoeur (1994), Seventh Study: “The Self and the Ethical Aim” in Oneself As Another, trans. Kathleen Blamey (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press), 169-202.

Ethics: Preliminaries

Photo by cottonbro from Pexels

Ethics is the study of the choices people make regarding right and wrong.

1. Two extremes:

Moral Relativism – the belief that decisions about right and wrong are purely personal and subjective.

Absolutophobia – the fear of saying unequivocally that certain behavior is unethical.

(ex. One is passionate about animal rights but can’t take a stand regarding abortion.)

2. Etymology:

Ethics: ethos (Gk.) – custom or particular behavior; mos,moris (Lat.) – custom

Custom – a more or less permanent behavior in accordance with the precepts of the natural moral law, which is universally known and common to all men.

3. Material and Formal Object of Ethics:

Material object: Human Acts

Formal object quod: Right Conduct – human acts are considered under the aspect of their being right or wrong.

Formal object quo: the principles and conclusions of ethics are derived From Human Reason Alone

4. Some Truths Presupposed in Ethics:

– The existence of God

– The dignity of the human person

– The immortality of the soul

5. Division of Ethics:

  1. General Ethics
    1. The ultimate end of man
    2. Human acts
    3. Morality of human acts
    4. Law and conscience
    5. Virtue in general
    6. Historical survey of the different ethical traditions
  1. Special Questions in Ethics
    1. Rights and duties
    2. Individual ethics
    3. Social ethics
    4. Political ethics
    5. Professional ethics

6. The Ultimate End of Man

What is the purpose of human life?

Anaxagoras: “to contemplate the sun”

Socrates: “to learn how to die”

Epicurus: “sensual and intellectual pleasures”

Zeno: “to be superior to sufferings”

Plato: “the right cultivation of the human soul”

End – that toward which an action tends.

Proximate End – an immediate end on account of which an action is immediately performed.

Intermediate End – a subordinate end sought for the attainment of another end.

Ultimate End – that on account of which other ends or means are sought.

Absolute Last End – “that end for the sake of which all other things are desired and which is not itself desired for the sake of anything else.” (St. Thomas Aquinas)

End of the Action – the intrinsic purpose of the action

End of the Agent – the intention or purpose that an agent has in mind.

7. Three principles concerning the end of human actions:

  1. Every agent that performs an action acts for the sake of an end to be attained.
  2. Every agent acts for an ultimate end.
  3. Every agent has the power of moving for an end which is suitable or good for him.

8. Good:

Good – that which satisfies the appetite, the object of our striving, the thing which can confer perfection and satisfaction to our powers or faculties.

9. Kinds of Goods:

Real Good – truly good in itself

Apparent Good – evil in itself but appears to be good

Conditional Good – good under a certain aspect

Simple Good – something perfect according to its own nature

Imperfect Good – anything that satisfies the appetites

Perfect Good – that which can satisfy human nature completely and to the highest degree and leaves nothing to be desired.

10. The Voluntary Act

An act is properly called a human act when it is voluntary.

Voluntariness – from the Latin word voluntas – which means “will”, the faculty proper to man.

11. Classifications of Voluntary Acts:

  1. Free or necessary – according as one can or cannot abstain from.
  1. Perfect voluntary­ – act performed with complete knowledge and full consent;

Imperfect voluntary – the act performed by a person who acts without fully realizing what he means to do, or without fully intending the act.

  1. Directly voluntary – willed as an end in itself;

Indirect voluntary – desired not as an end in itself but as a foreseen effect or sequence of the act

  1. Explicit or Expressed voluntary – happens when the consent to an action is externally manifested by words or by signs;

Tacit voluntary act – given by silence

  1. Pure or Simple voluntary – willed with full consent and without dislike;

Mixed or Conditional voluntary – willed under certain conditions but at the same time is not likeable under other conditions.

  1. Actual, virtual, habitual and interpretative voluntariness or intention

Actual intention­ – that which is present “here and now” in the mind while performing the action

Virtual intention – that which is made at some former time and still influences the act which is now being performed

Habitual intention – the retention in the unconscious mind of an intention made at some former time and which, although actually forgotten, has never been retracted

Interpretative intention – the result of interpreting the intention of one who is not present or of one who does not have the power of judgment to make a decision by himself

12. The Modifiers of the Voluntary Act:

The following factors either increase or lessen the voluntariness of a human act:

  1. Ignorance
  2. Passions or Concupiscence
  3. Fear
  4. Violence
  5. Habits

Principle: The greater the knowledge and freedom, the greater the voluntariness and moral responsibility involved. The lesser the knowledge and freedom, the lesser the voluntariness and moral responsibility involved.

13. The Sources of Morality:

Three elements composing the morality of the particular action performed by a free agent:

  1. The Object – the substance of the moral act
  2. The Motive/End – the purpose or intention for the sake of which something is done
  3. The Circumstances – the conditions modifying human actions, either by increasing or by diminishing the responsibility attending them